Questions & Answers

New World Order Evidence: What the Theories Actually Cite

The phrase “New World Order evidence” is a contested piece of vocabulary. The serious student of conspiracy theory treats the question of evidence carefully, because the most common error in this field is the uncritical compilation of items that purport to support a general theory but that, on careful examination, do not bear the weight the theory places on them. This page examines the five most commonly cited items, describes the conspiracy reading, and summarizes the mainstream rebuttal. The broader context is in the New World Order overview, and the question of who, if anyone, really runs the world is treated in the who really rules the world overview.

George H.W. Bush’s 1990 Speech

The Conspiracy Reading

On September 11, 1990, President George H.W. Bush addressed a joint session of Congress to discuss the Gulf crisis. Bush used the phrase “new world order” several times. The most cited passage read: “Out of these troubled times, a new world order can emerge… a new era, freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace.”

The conspiracy reading holds that the speech was a public signal to a knowing audience that the alleged New World Order was being announced. Bush is alleged, in some versions, to have been reading from a script prepared by the Council on Foreign Relations or the Bilderberg Group.

The Mainstream Rebuttal

The mainstream reading holds that Bush was using a phrase that had been in circulation in foreign policy circles for decades, having appeared in Woodrow Wilson’s 1916 speeches, H.G. Wells’s 1940 book, and many subsequent foreign policy writings. The phrase was reported and discussed in the mainstream press at the time as a normal political address. The dog whistle reading is weak because the speech was received as such by the audience for which it was intended, with no evidence of a knowing inner audience.

The Eye of Providence on the Dollar Bill

The Conspiracy Reading

The Eye of Providence appears at the top of the unfinished pyramid on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States, and is reproduced on the one-dollar bill. The phrase “Annuit Coeptis” appears above the eye, and “Novus Ordo Seclorum” appears below the pyramid.

The conspiracy reading holds that the Eye is an ancient occult symbol, that the unfinished pyramid represents a planned program of world domination, and that “Novus Ordo Seclorum” refers to the alleged New World Order. The whole is alleged to be a Masonic symbol placed on the currency by a Masonic founding generation.

The Mainstream Rebuttal

The Eye of Providence was a common motif in eighteenth-century European art, with no particular connection to any secret society. The unfinished pyramid represents strength and duration. “Novus Ordo Seclorum” was suggested by the classical scholar Joel Barlow as a conventional classical allusion. The seal was the product of a public committee process and is treated in greater detail in the secret societies on US currency and all-seeing eye overviews. The strong reading requires unsupported assumptions about the founding generation and the seal’s symbolism.

The United Nations Building

The Conspiracy Reading

The United Nations headquarters in New York, completed in 1952, has been the subject of conspiracy attention since its opening. The conspiracy reading holds that the building’s design incorporates references to the alleged New World Order, including alleged Masonic geometry, occult symbols, and resemblance to Masonic temples. The Agenda 21 document from the 1992 Rio Earth Summit is cited as evidence of a coordinated UN program.

The Mainstream Rebuttal

The UN building was designed by an international team of architects, including Le Corbusier and Oscar Niemeyer, and reflects the mid-twentieth-century modernist aesthetic of its designers. The presence of curved and circular elements is a feature of modernist architecture rather than a coded reference. Agenda 21 is a non-binding policy document. The strong reading of the UN is examined in the New World Order overview.

The MK-Ultra Program

The Conspiracy Reading

The MK-Ultra program, a series of CIA experiments conducted between 1953 and 1973, is sometimes cited as evidence of a coordinated government program to develop mind control techniques for use against the American public. The program, which involved the administration of LSD and other drugs to unwitting subjects, was exposed in the mid-1970s by the Church Committee.

The conspiracy reading holds that MK-Ultra was evidence of a much larger program of social control that continued after the formal end of the project, and that the program was part of a coordinated global effort.

The Mainstream Rebuttal

MK-Ultra was a real program, conducted by a real agency, with real victims. The program was exposed through congressional oversight, was formally ended, and was the subject of compensation programs. The declassified CIA files and the Church Committee report document the program in detail. The strong reading requires the unsupported assumption that the formal end of the program was a cover for a larger program that continues. The serious lessons of the documented program tend to be obscured by the conspiracy version, which is examined in the deep state overview.

The Great Reset and Digital Identity

The Conspiracy Reading

The World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” initiative, announced in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, has been the subject of extensive conspiracy attention. The initiative proposed reforms including the expansion of digital infrastructure, the development of digital identity systems, and the reform of the international tax system. The conspiracy reading holds that the Great Reset is a public version of the New World Order agenda.

In some versions, the COVID-19 pandemic is alleged to have been deliberately engineered as a pretext for the Great Reset. Digital identity programs in various countries are cited as evidence of an alleged coordinated program.

The Mainstream Rebuttal

The Great Reset is a real policy initiative advanced by a real international institution, and its actual content is the subject of legitimate policy debate. The proposed reforms are conventional policy proposals of the kind that international institutions have advanced for decades. The digital identity programs are real programs with real benefits and real costs. The strong reading requires unsupported assumptions about the coordination of the various national programs and the intentions of the WEF.

The Pattern in the Evidence

What Is Actually Cited

The five items above are the most commonly cited items in contemporary New World Order discourse. Each is, in itself, a real historical fact, a real institution, or a real policy initiative. The conspiracy reading of each requires an additional inference from the documented fact to a conclusion that is not supported by the fact itself. The Bush speech is a real speech; the claim that it was a coded announcement is an additional inference. The Eye of Providence is a real symbol; the claim that it is evidence of an ongoing conspiracy is an additional inference.

The pattern of additional inference is not, in itself, evidence of bad faith. The problem is that the inferences are typically not supported by the evidence, and are typically presented as if they were the only reasonable reading.

The Strongest Version

The strongest version of the New World Order argument holds that the items, taken together, constitute a coherent case for a coordinated program. The mainstream response is that the items do not add up to the conclusion. The items are drawn from different historical periods, institutions, and policy domains. The alleged connections are typically not supported.

The proper response is careful evaluation of each item on its merits, combined with skepticism about the aggregation step. The fact that several items can be cited does not, by itself, constitute evidence of a coordinated program. The serious student should distinguish between the strong version, which is not supported, and the moderate version, in which informal networks of power are real and worthy of public attention, even if they do not constitute a coordinated conspiracy.

Sources and Further Reading

The standard scholarly references are Michael Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy (2003) for the comparative analysis; Robert Goldberg, Enemies Within: The Culture of Conspiracy in Modern America (2001) for the American right-wing tradition; the relevant chapters of Jodi Dean, Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories in American History (2019); the 2018 special issue of Critical Inquiry on conspiracy theory; and for the academic analysis of the deep-state concept, Michael J. Glennon, National Security and Double Government (2014). The standard reference for the Bush 1990 speech in context is John R. MacArthur, Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War (1992, 2nd ed. 2004). For the Great Reset, Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret’s own COVID-19: The Great Reset (2020) is the primary text.

The New World Order cluster, conspiracy theories and hidden power, secret societies and government, and deep state and secret societies cover the surrounding context. The who really rules the world long-tail page sorts the candidates by evidence.